We need to think about how needed registrar's diversification is for the ecosystem. The council should always think of a balance between community building and security - and not having more registrars seems an unsafe approach in both directions. 

I have been working in the last days with Liebi to include the feedback the council gave to their past registrar proposal. In perspective and after the last registrar discussions, it now seems like an attractive approach, especially taking into account the changes made. 

I submitted motion 164 to the council to be voted on this new proposal and hopefully passed to the referenda queue for the community to vote after. This decision is based on 1. The need for certain degree of redundancy and the importance of the role, 2. The changes Liebi has made taking into account the council suggestions.

The amended proposal can be found here: https://hackmd.io/@WUwOYEcKS7SDniXXxl93yA/ryqHRsDaI 

- The council is discussing the importance of having multiple registrars for the ecosystem.
- Liebi has made changes to their registrar proposal based on council feedback.
- Motion 164 has been submitted to the council for voting on the new proposal.
- The proposal will then be passed to the community for voting.
- The amended proposal can be found at the provided link.

#164 Motion to add Liebi as Registrar