Dear council,
This motion seeks to reject five proposals for the following reasons:
<ol>
<li><a href="../treasury/196" target="_blank" rel="noopener">196 </a>- Submitted by an unknown parity by error</li>
<li><a href="../treasury/198" target="_blank" rel="noopener">198 </a>- Blockchain Rio 2022 - Event expired, funds no longer required</li>
<li><a href="../treasury/199" target="_blank" rel="noopener">199 </a>- Pais Digital Chile Summit - Event expired, funds no longer required</li>
<li><a href="../treasury/209" target="_blank" rel="noopener">209 </a>- LucasYoda - A revised proposal was submitted in its place</li>
<li><a href="../treasury/211" target="_blank" rel="noopener">211 </a>- Fearless Wallet - Erroneous submission, superseded by 212</li>
</ol>
Voting Aye supports rejecting all of these proposals.
Regards,
&nbsp;

proposalId

remark

- The council is rejecting five proposals.
- The first proposal was submitted by mistake.
- The second and third proposals are for events that have already happened and don't need funding anymore.
- The fourth proposal has been replaced by a revised version.
- The fifth proposal was submitted by mistake and has been replaced by another proposal.

#575 Housekeeping - Rejection of five redundant treasury proposals