Following the spirit of [Proposal 382](https://kusama.subsquare.io/referenda/382) of testing the brand-new Treasury on Kusama Asset Hub, and since we've recently introduced controlling accounts via XCM, we'd like to make a small test:

We [transferred `1.1` KSM](https://kusama.subscan.io/extrinsic/0x08be5b237af6cc74a5b33eb5ee24221a503dab89c74c4e1a93f5973cd28e67d9) to the [remote treasury](https://assethub-kusama.subscan.io/xcm_message/kusama-fbeab4ac80c3904937011c53ca930c8d04e56c55) account on Asset Hub.

This proposal is expected to spend `1.1` KSM on `CuYrHbj4PNqVnpA17o8LDigdNXXYvEU7UaYW3kVyAdQskpE` (`../Parachain(2281)/Body(1)/Voice` on KAH) as the beneficiary.

Once the proposal is executed, we'll submit a referenda in Kreivo, from our [community governance](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fkreivo.io%2F#/extrinsics/decode/0x4900470100000141011f0001010100a10f030c000400010000b28ce9061300010000b28ce90600060162f43e262538a40a0300d8dba69752ffb04fa563b126a31b037c8bebeb73e3c66cacd7c8efab46bd3423070010a5d4e80000000000). The outcome of that referenda is to send an XCM call to Asset Hub, to execute [`Balances::transfer_keep_alive`](https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fsys.ibp.network%2Fstatemine#/extrinsics/decode/0x0a0300d8dba69752ffb04fa563b126a31b037c8bebeb73e3c66cacd7c8efab46bd3423070010a5d4e8) to move `1` KSM back to the original sender (me).

We proposed this proof with two goals in mind:

1. Prove we can execute XCM Calls from our communities anywhere on Kusama Network.
2. Prove it's possible to make payouts to any XCM Location, not just accounts.

## FAQ

> **Q:** Have you ever tried if this works?
Yup, we made some tests using Chopsticks to ensure this is an acceptable behaviour given the current limitations of XCM on Kusama Asset Hub. What we found out is that we could use `Balances`, but no `PolkadotXcm` due to the `SafeCallFilter`, nor use something like `Proxy`. So, we're kinda limited, but we still want to try using this system with the limitations we have. That's how we designed the scope of this test proposal.

- **Problem Statement:** Addressing the need for a referendum on Polkassembly for the community.
- **Significance:** Ensuring community engagement and decision-making.
- **Proposed Solution:** Conducting a referendum on Polkassembly.
- **Expected Outcomes:** Increased community involvement and decision-making.

#383 Kusama Asset Hub Treasury - Testing the Payout to a Kreivo Community

No Active Proposals