## Short note

If this proposal passes, it will only send a `system remark` as signal for the following topic.
So in short, nothing will break here, whatever you vote, it will either add a short comment onchain or do nothing,

If the proposal passes, it will write on chain:
````
Registrar #1 should keep on performing human verification
````

I would then take it as signal that the Kusama community would rather keep this extra step. The outcome will likely also mirror on Polkadot.

**NOT** Voting means "Yep, get rid of this extra costly human check".

## Context

Since its introduction, `Registrar #1` is performing a human verification for every single identity verification.
This is even currently done twice per verification and I plan on reducing this to either 1 occurence or even 0.

Whether a human verification should be maintained is the topic of this vote and I would like to gather the general opinion. This is a signaling vote and I reserve the right to make the final call on this topic.

I am inclined to remove the human step for every single verification for the following reasons:
- it takes time (quite some...)
- Meanwhile, I have improved the automatic checks in the process to the point where my automatic checks are aligned with my "human" checks and the manual verification becomes rather useless
- it increases the costs (= the registrar fee)
- I have the feeling users don't really care about the extra check and would rather pay less

If my feeling is incorrect and this human check is valued, I will happily think about alternatives.

- This proposal is about whether or not to keep a human verification step.
- If the proposal passes, it will write on chain that the human verification should continue.
- If you vote, it will either add a comment or do nothing.
- Not voting means getting rid of the human check.
- The person who made the proposal will make the final decision.

#99 Human verification for Registrar #1